From latzko@ns1.rutgers.edu Wed Feb  2 12:02:08 1994
Received: from demon.corp.portal.com (demon.corp.portal.com [156.151.1.10]) by jobe.shell.portal.com (8.6.4/8.6.4) with ESMTP id MAA11522 for <chan@shell.portal.com>; Wed, 2 Feb 1994 12:02:07 -0800
Received: from nova.unix.portal.com (nova.unix.portal.com [156.151.1.101]) by demon.corp.portal.com (8.6.4/8.6.4) with ESMTP id MAA08796 for <chan@corp.portal.com>; Wed, 2 Feb 1994 12:01:21 -0800
Received: from ns1.rutgers.edu (ns1.rutgers.edu [128.6.21.6]) by nova.unix.portal.com (8.6.4/8.6.4-1.13) with SMTP id MAA04927 for <chan@corp.portal.com>; Wed, 2 Feb 1994 12:02:04 -0800
Received: by ns1.rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.5/3.08) 
	id AA24793; Wed, 2 Feb 94 14:53:32 EST
Received: from dazixca.dazixca.ingr.com by ns1.rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.5/3.08) 
	id AA24783; Wed, 2 Feb 94 14:53:24 EST
Received: from hound.edaca.ingr.com by dazixca.edaca.ingr.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA25257; Wed, 2 Feb 94 11:52:21 PST
Received: by hound.edaca.ingr.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA01826; Wed, 2 Feb 94 11:53:02 PST
From: crphilli@hound.edaca.ingr.com (Ron Phillips)
Message-Id: <9402021953.AA01826@hound.edaca.ingr.com>
Subject: Re: your mail
To: int_walls%am.ebp771.ECCX.umc@esu32.ateng.az.honeywell.com (Gerald Walls)
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 94 11:53:01 PST
Cc: firearms-politics@ns1.rutgers.edu, libernet@dartmouth.edu
In-Reply-To: <0910331202021994/A09533/EBP771>; from "Gerald Walls" at Feb 2, 94 12:40 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 06.00.01.12 (2.3 PL11)]
Status: RO

Gerald Walls writes:

>->I tried using the mail-fax service to send a message to Dole and McCain but 
>->received a reply saying that the numbers +1-202-224-6721 and +1-202-228-2862 
>->were not covered.

I don't have McCain's FAX number but I believe Dole's is (202) 224-8952.


-- 
************************************************************
* Ron Phillips               crphilli@hound.edaca.ingr.com *
* Senior Customer Engineer                                 *
* Intergraph Electronics                                   *
* 381 East Evelyn Avenue             VOICE: (415) 691-6473 *
* Mountain View, CA 94041            FAX:   (415) 691-0350 *
************************************************************

From ca-firearms-owner  Thu Jul 28 14:47:44 1994
Return-Path: ca-firearms-owner
Received: from localhost (chan@localhost) by jobe.shell.portal.com (8.6.4/8.6.4) id OAA02995 for ca-firearms-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 14:47:39 -0700
Received: from nova.unix.portal.com (nova.unix.portal.com [156.151.1.101]) by jobe.shell.portal.com (8.6.4/8.6.4) with ESMTP id OAA02984 for <ca-firearms@shell.portal.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 14:47:35 -0700
Received: from eagle.wd.Cubic.COM (eagle.wd.Cubic.COM [149.63.66.9]) by nova.unix.portal.com (8.6.7/8.6.4) with ESMTP id OAA26182 for <ca-firearms@shell.portal.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 14:47:30 -0700
Received: from novell.wd.cubic.com (novell.wd.Cubic.COM [149.63.66.2]) by eagle.wd.Cubic.COM (8.3/8.3) with SMTP id OAA11696; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 14:44:49 -0700
Received: From CWD_E/WORKQUEUE by novell.wd.cubic.com
          via Charon-4.0A-VROOM with IPX id 100.940728143836.384;
          28 Jul 94 14:51:02 +0500
Message-ID: <MAILQUEUE-101.940728143833.608@novell.wd.cubic.com>
From: "Shawn G. Bosley" <BOSLEY@novell.wd.cubic.com>
Organization:  Cubic
To: ca-firearms@shell.portal.com
Date:          Thu, 28 Jul 1994 14:38:34 PST
Subject:       Fax to Dole
Priority: normal
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v3.1 (R1a)
Sender: ca-firearms-owner@shell.portal.com
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Don't forget to fax Dole to ask him to filibuster the Crime Bill. I 
know that it's a slim chance, but it's worth a try. Here are his two 
fax numbers:

   (913) 371-2403
   (913) 295-2748

Here's a copy of my fax to Dole:

----------------------------------------------------------------------


                        July 28, 1994


    Senator Robert Dole
    U.S. Senate
    Washington, DC 20510


    Dear Senator Dole:


    I wish to urge you to vote no and filibuster any Crime Bill
    that emerges from the Conference Committee that contains
    guns bans or magazine bans. Recently, the Committee approved
    by a slim margin the text of the gun and magazine bans into
    the Crime Bill. These provisions will effect far more guns than
    just the "19" guns that are specifically listed. The generic
    criteria will apply to roughly 200 guns models. The magazine
    ban limitation to 10 rounds will apply to even more guns. Even
    common 9mm pistols like the Berrettas and the Rugers will be
    effected by the magazine limitations.

    Not only is this far reaching legislation unconstitutional, but
    it opens the door for governmental abuse of law-abiding citizens.
    A similar ban that was enacted in California has resulted in
    some innocent people being arrested and jailed because the police
    mistakenly thought that the gun found in their possession was
    a banned "assault rifle." Needless to say, the California ban
    has been the subject of lawsuits and may be overturned in the
    future.

    Should this ban become law, The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and
    Firearms (BATF), will be given even more authority to abuse
    law-abiding citizens. Some in Congress have called the BATF
    a "rogue" agency and have actually called for its dismantlement.
    The BATF has demonstrated its ability to assault law-abiding
    citizens in recent situations like the Randy Weaver case, and the
    Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas.

    Even in my home town in San Diego there was a case recently
    where federal agents were operating on a bad tip from an
    informant and nearly shot to death an innocent civilian
    in his home at midnight in a "Rambo" style raid. After being
    hospitalized, the civilian has survived and is now suing these
    government agencies for millions of dollars. The agencies never
    bothered to verify the informant's tip. The informant later 
    admitted that he was wrong.

    I ask you, Senator Dole, what guarantees are you willing to make
    to law-abiding gun owners that they will not be the subject of
    BATF "Rambo" style raids if this legislation passes? Can you
    honestly allow this bill to pass knowing the abuses that it will
    lead to? Please vote no and take steps to filibuster this bill
    now.

