From best-rkba@mainstream.com Tue Nov 22 08:10:08 1994
Received: from nova.unix.portal.com (nova.unix.portal.com [156.151.1.101]) by jobe.shell.portal.com (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA19373; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 08:10:07 -0800
Received: from n8ino.mainstream.com (n8ino.mainstream.com [192.231.143.2]) by nova.unix.portal.com (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA13801; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 08:10:01 -0800
Received: from  (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n8ino.mainstream.com (8.6.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id KAA27704; Tue, 22 Nov 1994 10:10:43 -0500
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 10:10:43 -0500
Message-Id: <199411221510.KAA27704@n8ino.mainstream.com>
Errors-To: listproc@Mainstream.com
Reply-To: best-rkba@Mainstream.com
Originator: best-rkba@mainstream.com
Sender: best-rkba@Mainstream.com
Precedence: bulk
From: best-rkba@Mainstream.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <best-rkba@mainstream.com>
Subject: BEST-RKBA digest 149
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Right to Keep and Bear Arms "Best of" list
Status: RO

			    BEST-RKBA Digest 149

Topics covered in this issue include:

  1) MEDIA: transcript of NPR's All Things Considered piece by aland@informix.com (Alan Denney)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Topic No. 1

Date: Mon, 21 Nov 1994 23:51:59 +0800
From: aland@informix.com (Alan Denney)
To: best-rkba@mainstream.com
Cc: aland@ten_forward.informix.com
Subject: MEDIA: transcript of NPR's All Things Considered piece
Message-ID: <9411220751.AA01950@ten_forward.informix.com>


For those who missed it, I transcribed my tape of ATC's piece a week
ago Friday (I think) where they try to analyze the NRA's impact
on the election results.  Just FYI.  See where your CPB tax dollars
are going?


--
Alan Denney      aland@informix.com      {pyramid|uunet}!infmx!aland

On 11/19/94, a Saturday Night Live sketch made reference to "armor piercing
dum-dum bullets".  Anybody know where to buy these?




All Things Considered 11/18/94  Cheryl Duvall segment on NRA's election impact
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------- (Linda Worthimer (?) introduction) -------------------------
In this week's election, there were several extremely influential special 
interest groups which spent money in campaign(ing) for their candidates,
like the National Rifle Association.  That organization was angered by the 
passage of the Brady Bill, the Clinton Crime Bill, and the ban on assault 
weapons.  Its contributions, some in the final days of the campaign, produced 
impressive results for the Gun Lobby. Among its priority campaigns, all but 
one of their US House or Senate candidates won their elections, and most 
of the candidates the NRA targeted for defeat went down.  

NPR's Cheryl Duvall reports.

-------------------------- Cheryl Duvall ----------------------------------
In a year that saw the most expensive midterm campaigning in history, the
National Rifle Association aimed carefully, spent strategically, and, in 
most cases, hit its target.  Neal Knox is Second Vice President of the 
National (sic) NRA.

  (Neal Knox speaking)  "It was a great election day for our candidates".

One of the many races in which a small but timely expenditure by the NRA
had some influence was in Washington State, where Republican newcomer 
George Nethercutt defeated US House Speaker Thomas Foley in the 
(Washington's) Fifth district.  Facing reporters Wednesday with his wife 
Heather, Foley conceded before the absentee ballots were all counted.  
"I know the thrill of election, as well as the honor of service, and so 
I want to say on behalf of Heather and myself, that we understand the 
thrill that George Nethercutt and his family are experiencing today."

Gun issues were *not* the decisive factor in this campaign.  Foleys' 30-year
tenure in Washington, his alliance with President Clinton, and his lawsuit 
against the citizens of his district all played a part in his defeat.   But 
a barrage of anti-Foley advertisements paid for by the NRA shortly before 
the election probably helped propel his opponents to the polls.  

Ellen Miller of the Center for Responsive Politics says that in this and other 
races, timing was key.

  (Ellen Miller Speaking):
  "In this election cycle, they seem to have targeted a number of races and 
   spent a quite a bit of money, particularly in the last few days, targeting 
   people who voted against them on their legislative agenda in this 
   last Congress.  The NRA vowed to 'get those people', those are *their* 
   words, and by running independent censure ads, they clearly went after
   them, and it clearly made a difference."

The most recent Federal Election Commission filing indicates that the NRA 
spent $3.2 million nationwide this election, $1.5 Million on political ads 
alone.  The organization, with millions of members nationwide, endorsed 
candidates in 276 House and Senate races, but it concentrated its spending 
on 24.  Some NRA money also went to defeat ballot initiatives like proposed 
handgun bans in Kenosha and Milwaukee, WI.  Nearly 1/5 of the money, 
$76,000, was spent on behalf of Representative Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania.  
At sportsmens' clubs, gun dealerships, and hunting lodges, the NRA distributed
brochures blasting the pro-gun-control record of Democratic incumbent Senator 
Harris Walford, who lost by two percentage points.

Neal Knox of the NRA says there are simple criteria for choosing
which candidates to back.

   (Neal Knox speaking)
   "There was no quid pro quo.  NRA doesn't make deals, they don't
    'buy' legislators, they *support* legislators or would-be legislators 
    who support them and their membership."  

Concentrated NRA spending didn't always work.  The organization spent $47,000
against New Mexico's Democratic Senator Jeff Bingaman, who won reelection.

Sometimes the NRA achieved its desired result by keeping a low profile.
Representative Jack Brooks of Texas, a 21-term incumbent and chair of 
the House Judiciary Committee, had maintained a perfect voting record with 
the NRA.  The organization withdrew its support when Brooks, like Foley, 
voted in favor of the Crime Bill.  In this week's election, the NRA endorsed neither Democrat Brooks nor his opponent, Republican accountant Steve Stockman.  
Stockman won.    

Still, Ellen Miller of the Center for Responsive Politics believes the NRA 
exercised a proportionately greater influence this election cycle than did 
other interest groups which didn't spend as much, or as strategically.

  (Ellen Miller Speaking):
  "Not every one, not every group, not every interest in this country has
   the kind of money at their disposal that the NRA has, and so what it
   does is really create a unlevel playing field on which those who have
   money to spend in this way have an opportunity to sway voters from one
   position to another position."

But the gun lobby, famously tenacious on its issues, would reply that it is 
only working within the political process as any concerned citizens should, 
by supporting its friends, punishing its enemies, and rallying its 
constituency.  

I'm Cheryl Duvall, reporting.

-------------------------- End of Segment ----------------------------------



------------------------------

End of BEST-RKBA Digest 149
***************************

